> He basically liked the idea of the book and used the bulk of its text as lorem ipsum in a demo for their most likely one person "digital agency" that probably has 3 clients including mom.

What is your basis for this belief?

Did you read the part about the obviously intentionally-added affiliate links to the original book?

> The only part of copyright I agree with is right to inalienable attribution [...] So whoever made this silly little thing gets a pass from me.

Did you read the part about the fake site appearing higher in search results for the author's own name?

> What is your basis for this belief?

My experience inflicted stupidity.

> Did you read the part about the obviously intentionally-added affiliate links to the original book?

I find it nice that they linked to the original book. For every x earned let the original author earn many times more. It's probably a better deal than the author got from their legal publisher.

> Did you read the part about the fake site appearing higher in search results for the author's own name?

And who's fault is that? Google? Or this little slop maker that I'm (again stupidly) assuming is not a SEO hacker.