|
| ▲ | kennyadam 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think to claim that 2000 years ago there was one person who performed miracles and/or healed people that nobody else could, with no actual evidence it was done and nobody else has been able to do it since, you need a better response to someone questioning it than “oh were you there? prove it didn’t happen.” |
| |
| ▲ | buddhistdude 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | No I don't because I'm not claiming that I know that it happened | | |
| ▲ | malfist an hour ago | parent [-] | | What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. There was no Jesus who performed miracles of healing |
|
|
|
| ▲ | casey2 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Because I was there? |
|
| ▲ | krapp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Because I'm a grownup who knows the difference between reality and make-believe. |
| |
| ▲ | buddhistdude 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I take from this that you don't, otherwise you would explain it | | |
| ▲ | krapp 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're the one who believes magic is real, it's up to you to explain it. Extraordinary claims and such. |
|
|
