The only (probably) good thing here is that one can at least try to apply Russian experience at circumventing the censorship, where it's currently way more severe, up to the point when entire companies have their workflows disrupted because remote workers can't connect through the VPN (which is blocked). Maybe that will help.

▲

Andrew_nenakhov 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You see, the problem is that all exit points of our VPNs are in Europe. These too can be banned quite easily. Where to will we run next, given that this cancer tends to spread?

▲

dryarzeg 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Change the protocols, I guess? Move to some kind of self-hosted or community-run infrastructure? Because to block all of that (EDIT: to block that reliably, I mean), you will have to block the entire EU network sector, and we're likely not in "V for Vendetta" or full-blown 1984 scenario for this to be possible.

▲

malfist 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Literally, tor.

	▲	dryarzeg 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Which will get blocked and go down, like, in no time. That's literally what happened in Russia - Tor is mostly unusable, you can't even bootstrap properly without some "tricks", so to speak.

▲

CamperBob2 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Run to the Kremlin, with torches in your hands.

	▲	Andrew_nenakhov an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah right, that worked out for Iranians quite well all these times.

▲

subscribed 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You seriously think the government has a clear, honest reasons, as stated?

Companies will be exempt (with remote employees having to identify linking their IP and computer's fingerprint with their real identity), and the next step, after using the law to silencing dissent, will be penalisation.