| ▲ | esquivalience 3 hours ago |
| I found the agressively staccato, clearly LLM-generated content extremely difficult to read. |
|
| ▲ | bstsb 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| for the first time in a while on HN, i disagree with the characterisation as AI-generated. at most it was drafted with an LLM, but the final output is pretty human to me. they used the wrong it’s/its, made But. its own one-word sentence, didn’t capitalise HTML, and used “okayy” in parenthesis. all of this isn’t to criticise the writer - i enjoyed it more seeing these little imperfections that make up a blog post |
| |
| ▲ | fortuitous-frog an hour ago | parent [-] | | Looks largely AI-written, with some human edits: https://www.pangram.com/history/9afe7542-1085-4264-9691-2172... FWIW -- I'm not as repulsed by it as the parent comment. But I do want to substantiate that it _is_ heavily LLM-written. (If you're unfamiliar, Pangram has garnered a reputation as the leading LLM-detector, with a minimal rate of false positives; IME this has come with the tradeoff of being easy to manipulate/tweak your way into turning an LLM-generated piece of text into reporting a false negative, but for most folks that's worthwhile.) | | |
| ▲ | darianvc 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | People do be having too much time... Is the navigation of the site also AI generated? This doesn't make any sense and proves why these AI detectors don't work | | |
| ▲ | MomsAVoxell 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I have been writing for a long time, and using AI for as long as it was available to me, and I have noticed that I get accused of being an AI more and more - and I do not think that is because I am an AI, but because we are all being consumed with the AI mind-set, and thus the AI is taking over our thinking - so perhaps subconsciously, I am indeed formulating my thoughts in a more AI-centric manner, prompting the association across the vast distances of the internet by other human beings (- or, AI) of my conscious thought, with an artifice. This is a banal insult, but it is also a dire warning wherever I see it - these days, people moaning about being AI may as well just be AI - automatic ignorance - but .. I do have to wonder. Am I, AI? |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | estetlinus 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s the new internet. So, so annoying. |
|
| ▲ | noduerme 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, but it's kinda weird. The typical LLM headers and bullet points are there, but it's like someone took an axe to the rest of the spew. I too would rather read someone's original bad writing than their bad editing of AI writing, but it's kinda interesting how this all shakes out. |
| |
| ▲ | darianvc 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Might stop using bullet points for not being flagged as AI lol "Very small" -> yeah, this header is mostly AI generated. No hate against the author but this doesn't make any sense as header | |
| ▲ | netsharc an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It doesn't seem to be LLM, but reads like one. The author is German, maybe it's a language expertise thing, maybe he likes the LLM style (unrelated to his nationality). But yeah, sentences that only have 3-4 word each feel like 3rd grade writing; I couldn't read it. | | |
| ▲ | weetii an hour ago | parent [-] | | Hey, I've always written like this. In school I couldn't stand subordinate clauses and long sentences because I'd lose my train of thought. But yea, I've noticed that people often find it hard to read so I'm going to work on that | | |
| ▲ | darianvc 25 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You're good fr. People on here who try to make their day about being AI detectives. You're trying to work on it and that's what matters |
|
| |
| ▲ | bartvk 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I wish people would include their prompts. |
|
|
| ▲ | scottmcdot 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Which bit? The short sentences? |
