Simple solution, Use your router to block whatever you need to, control your kids devices, the internet stays free and open.

What are we talking about?

There are no laws that will turn out well.

▲

singingtoday 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The entire point is to gain control over internet traffic. Your suggestion doesn't work because it requires people to implement it themselves and since you can't control all people, you can't control how they're going to implement it.

The title "for the children" is tongue-in-cheek. It's not serious.

▲

weddpros 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It amazes me how compartmented the mind of the West is: the "protector of Democracy" is barely conscient of its own lies... There is no democracy, barely an illusion of one.

▲

firecall 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The entire point is to gain control over internet traffic.

I see many arguments claiming it's about mass surveillance and an invasion of privacy and so on.

We already have mass surveillance, so I don't really buy into those arguments.

I think it's worth considering that it is actually about control. Or more precisely, that it's about dissuading citizens from using social media in the first place.

The damage done to our western democracies from misinformation spread via social media has not gone unnoticed...

	▲	ETH_start an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Censoring the internet is about as anti-democratic a policy that can be implemented. I remember reading someone argue that anytime you see a claim that we need to do something to protect democracy just replace the word democracy with bureaucracy and then the statement makes sense.

▲

petermcneeley 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You know what we are talking about. It was written in the book.