| ▲ | nonethewiser 7 hours ago |
| Porn companies should be held liable for distributing porn to minors. Its already illegal. Denial about requiring basic KYC is causing all sorts of perverse solutions. Accept the requirement so we can have a sensible technical solution. |
|
| ▲ | AngryData 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Oh no, children seeing naked people and sex! How horrible! Now lets bring them all to the family friendly farm where they can watch a horse with a monster dong screw his way through a herd of mares. |
| |
| ▲ | Bender 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In an interesting way this is a good example. It is indeed up to parents on a ranch to decide when their children are ready to see animals mate. It's another matter all together to decide when the small children or teens are ready to see humans mate. Either way that needs to be up to the parent or legal guardian. That is already their job. | | |
| ▲ | AngryData 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | You think ranch owners are hiding their farm practices from their children? Nah I don't believe that for one second. Ive watched 10 year olds of the most prudish family I ever known holding piglets so their dad can castrate them. Hell 20 year old Amish people can't even hold hands but will have kids help artificially inseminate cows. | | |
| ▲ | Bender 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Most small children on ranches have seen everything that can happen with animals including but not limited to mating, shooting coyotes, death from diseases. And yeah it's up to the parents when the kids see and do these things. Three year olds have a hard time with a lever action 45-70. There is a time when it makes sense and it's up to the parents when the kids are ready to understand and correctly follow instructions and are mature enough. This thread is about stopping the insanity of uploading and ultimately leaking PII of families before the kids can even consent to it. Kids will despise their parents if they could have stopped this and did not. They will absolutely appreciate their parents for protecting them from predatory companies. If we must pursue these predatory practices of colluding companies and governments then both of them need to be under stricter technical and audit requirements than PCI DSS and Fedramp. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Vates 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is a really weird thing to comment | |
| ▲ | BobbyTables2 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Travel not even needed. Lovebugs are visible and land on their arm. Try explaining WHY the bugs are connected… |
|
|
| ▲ | ikrenji 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| don't be so naive. if the billionaires want this, it can't be good for you. it really is that simple |
| |
| ▲ | Gigachad 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Tech billionaires want you and your kids on their social media platforms so they can manipulate you and serve ads. | |
| ▲ | Vates 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The billionaires don't want it though, that's why most of the big tech CEOs are against it. Perhaps we should listen to Elon Musk though, after all, he "brought free speech back to Twitter." That is, as long as we ignore the adjustments to the algorithm that boost his personal flavour of politics. At least he isn't banning anyone, bots included. | |
| ▲ | crummy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Billionaires also want vaccines, sometimes do they have our best interests in mind. They can’t extract wealth from the poor masses if we’re sick! |
|
|
| ▲ | zapataband1 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| and parents should actually parent their kids. Their kids do not need phones at such a young age and their parents should be in control of their own kid's phone. |
