It should be possible to respond "I don't know". When you really-really don't know, it's unfair to get a 1/4 chance at right anyway, or even better if you use routine multiple-choice tactics.

I got credit for a few that I would have happily just missed.

▲

dktp 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Agreed

I did the full 100. It's not even 1/4, with the harder ones when one description is significantly longer than others, it's the correct one. Even outside that 2 choices are usually some object - which I think is never the correct answer

I'd also say the toughness should be mixed up a little. The last 30 or so became a slog

Cool idea though!

	▲	ngruhn an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Also a lot of questions had "right answer" / "opposite of right answer" pairs. Just by identifying those you get to 50% probability.

▲

tengwar2 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's probably more meaningful to force a guess, since you may guess on the basis of word elements that you do know. At worst, it's possible to compensate for a 25% chance of getting the right word by chance.

▲

supermdguy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Agreed, there were also a few where I deduced the correct definition by comparing the options.

▲

throwaway82931 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, I way overperformed on this test because it was multiple choice. There were 11 words I didn't know at all, and another 8 where I was uncertain to varying degrees. My score of 99/100 does not reflect my actual ability. Even the one I got wrong was a misclick.

	▲	gerdesj 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Miss-click! I managed a paltry 90/100. Some of those words require a classical education and probably a British one at that. I studied Latin at two posh schools and have O level English Language and Literature (that's two qualis at age 16). I'm pretty well read and know exactly who Sandi and Stephen are. Ironically Sandi is Danish but notably erudite (that turned up for me) and navigates her way around English with remarkable aplomb.