| ▲ | evilfred an hour ago | |||||||||||||
this isn't an achievement, it's yet another amateur crank claiming he solved a famous puzzle, without a paper and without any critical review. many people have claimed to decode Linear A before. just because this guy used an LLM doesn't make it more credible | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Kosturdistan an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
He has a working draft of a manuscript that may form the basis of a scholarly article, it has been shared with experts, and there is an excerpt of the paper in my blog post. I have also seen and read the paper with my own 2 eys, I can't publish it though, Tom wants to keep that under wraps while it's reviewed by linguistics experts. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||