| ▲ | Doohickey-d 6 hours ago | |||||||
Well, it could als also be argued that Chrome _is_ more secure, for example because it uses app-bound encryption using Windows DPAPI system, for cookies, so that it at least tries to protect cookies from malicious applications running on the device. Firefox does not do this: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/279629/are-cook... If course the reverse can also be argued, for example that Firefox supports proper adblocking. | ||||||||
| ▲ | AlexandrB 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Unfortunately the malicious actor I want to protect my cookies from is Google. | ||||||||
| ||||||||