| ▲ | dijit 7 hours ago |
| Is the implication that Firefox is not maintained or? The issue presented doesn’t seem to be “an up to date browser check” it seems to be a “is it latest chrome” check, which is a very different thing. |
|
| ▲ | SoftTalker 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| We don't know. The author doesn't mention how current the Firefox browser is/was. If the organization is indeed enabling a specific check for Chrome that seems a little over the top but they're the ones supporting their users and if they want to make their life easier by only dealing with one browser that's their decision to make. It's like saying that everyone has to use Windows, or a specific line of laptops, or any other standardization to simplify the support workload. |
| |
| ▲ | rpdillon 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > This was for a Google Workspace Business Plus account and workspace, from an up to date browser and OS. | |
| ▲ | kolinko 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not a little over the top, it is anticompetitive behavior. | | | |
| ▲ | michaelmrose 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's not a little over the top its an antitrust issue and clearly and obviously wrong. | |
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's not clear to me that Context-Aware Access is as configurable as you're implying. At a glance, the docs seem to suggest that Chrome is the only browser you can force standardization on, which IMO does push this towards being Google's fault. | | |
| ▲ | insanitybit 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's correct, there is no way to say "only allow Firefox" in CAA because the attestations are either browser agnostic or chrome specific (as part of the managed Chrome offering that GSuite supports). |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ibejoeb 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No, not at all. The implication is that the organization is dictating the software that employees are to use. There's nothing unusual about this. |
|
| ▲ | jstummbillig 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If we are meant to believe that this is a Chrome-invasion-move, it's the least effective lever of all times. Most of the time the more plausible explanations are just the likely ones. |
| |
| ▲ | dijit 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | you’d probably say something different if it were microsoft. I don’t see why I should give affordances of good will to Google here. They’re not stupid, they know that this is an effective lever to further cement full-fat chrome as the default browser for the internet. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Chrome was created because Google felt that the IE monopoly was hindering the advancement of web standards and improved browser capabilities. I suppose you could argue that was a different Google at a different time, but at one point they did feel that browser diversity was a good thing. | | |
| ▲ | recursivecaveat 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I mean, they claimed to be for browser diversity when it was not them on top lol. Underdogs want the race to tighten up, 85% market leaders want to stay out in front. |
|
|
|
