| ▲ | jrm4 an hour ago | |
Yes, and this is exactly why ATProto is worse and more dangerous. Instances are safer. precisely because they are more genuinely decentralized. The ability to forever tie your stuff to a person, strongly, is exactly what the surveillance state would want. Mastodon's model gives you plausible deniability. It's safer. | ||
| ▲ | danabramov an hour ago | parent [-] | |
I'd say atproto gives you a clear sense of what's tied to each of your identities — you can go and explore your repo in a browser. There's nothing to say your identity has to be "tied to a person" anymore than your Mastodon account on some server is "tied to a person". It's true atproto has a "scraping is the default, so expect it" vibe, whereas maybe you're arguing Mastodon allows security by obscurity? | ||