| ▲ | pixl97 an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
>which is the central thesis here No, not exactly. We're dealing with a historical confluence of long term changes in humanity. Before 1900 or so and some people had a lot of kids survive and others had a lot of kids die. The population rate increased very slowly, and not from a lack of trying. Then around the time I stated people figured out germs were real, chlorine in water was good, and washing ones hands was a swell idea. The population exploded. Then you couple this with the technological revolution and the necessity of training huge amounts of the population for specialists jobs if they want to make a living and suddenly a boat load of kids doesn't make any sense at all. And it's getting to the point of the squeeze that having any kids doesn't make a lot of sense for a lot of people. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | inigyou an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is no meaning of life if you don't have kids. Childless people realize this when they're around 50 and it's too late to have kids. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||