| ▲ | narag an hour ago | |
I found a solution for what seems to be the same problem, in a different language: a particular type of lists, where the class metadata is stored once and the data for each instance is contiguously stored in a flat array. Not sure if it covers exactly the same terrain, but perusing the article, it seems to be the case, with a single instance being the degenerate case. | ||
| ▲ | cogman10 an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Yup, it's the same terrain. I've made something like this in the past. And I did it exactly because `List<Foo>` was too expensive and slow. | ||