| ▲ | yorwba 10 hours ago |
| There is a typo in "Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia," it should be "Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia" instead. (Also, it breaks the layout.) |
|
| ▲ | alun 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| I kind of like how it breaks the layout, since it's such a ridiculous word |
|
| ▲ | summarybot 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Let the ironic screaming at the sight of this word commence! |
|
| ▲ | bobson381 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| also interrobang is rendered as bang-interro (!?) when it should be interro (?) then bang (!) -> (?!) |
| |
| ▲ | zamadatix 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There isn't a "correct" way to incorrectly render the interrobang as 2 separate characters. The name was never supposed to suggest a certain ordering instead of just being both at the same time. The name "interrobang" just sounded better than "exclamaquest" (or any of the alternatives Type Talks readers submitted). | | |
| ▲ | bobson381 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Huh, interesting. I retract my previous statement! I'd love to read about this if you have a source. |
| |
| ▲ | egypturnash 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No, it should be rendered with the proper Unicode: U+203D ‽ | |
| ▲ | spelufo 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | do you really think so?! I think bang-interro just didn't sound as nice and that's probably why it is called an interrobang. |
|
|
| ▲ | classified 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I bet that "p" just bounced out of pure spite. |
| |
|
| ▲ | spacebacon 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |
