I don't think anyone would debate that. But if someone is going to go with a completely unverified "everyone I know" scare tactic about a common medical procedure, then I might as well respond with the fact that everyone I know hasn't had any problems with it. It would be completely different if they said they had suffered a rare side effect which only affected them. Instead, their point seems to be that it's widely dangerous, and their only evidence for that is a vague set of symptoms they experienced which, even more vaguely, "everyone" experienced "some of".

So we've departed from the realm of clinical analysis and entered the realm of hearsay and feelings. And on that level, such a claim cannot be challenged with facts or statistics. But what an irrational claim can be challenged with is equal assertions of irrational feelings toward the opposite.

In other words, I would challenge a rational claim with another rational claim, but I won't bother with that for people whose arguments aren't based on reason. In that case, it's best to throw out a hearsay claim in exchange for a hearsay claim, and save your facts for people who care.

The goal of winning an argument isn't to convince someone that they're wrong (if this person is even real or believes what they say), it's to show the flaws in their reasoning to whoever they're trying to convince.

I mean, maybe what do you think about 4 weeks later? If I'm being put under I think more than 4 days is reasonable to expect my mind to recover. If I have a terrible flu I could be in a fog for as few.

However this is not to diminish your report specifically, just that in terms of what I care about long-term it is the >2 weeks effects

Right, there are operations that are sometimes performed with minimal (or sometimes even 0 sedation) with just a nerve block (regional anesthesia) which impairs sensation locally (like you get when a dentist numbs up your mouth, but you’re still awake). They have the same rates of cognitive dysfunction afterward.

Thank you, some of the effects I felt, and I have even worse stuff, and even though I had been anesthetized multiple times in my life (also naturally with a concussion), but how could I prove cause and effect? There is no second me who did not go through the same procedures to compare myself.

Which end are we scoping? Colonoscopy is often done without anaesthesia but tends to take longer than 2 minutes, so I'm not sure if that's what OC is referring to. It's uncomfortable, but that's ok. Scoping nose/mouth->stomach also doesn't come with any drugs, just some lube.

Conscious sedation, which is not the same thing as general anesthesia, is often used for endoscopy:

https://www.northerncarealliance.nhs.uk/patient-information/...

I've done it (it's standard in many countries). Honestly, it's a bit horrifying because you are completely at the mercy of someone else but it's bearable. Colonoscopy is definitely easier.

My only experience with global anesthesia was as a child waking up with a massive asthma attack unable to breathe so I try to avoid it.

very common. doing it routinely. you never heard of it?