| |
| ▲ | sam_lowry_ 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Thank them for making the web depend on a single US-based shady org, as if DNS was not enough. | | |
| ▲ | cpach 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Feel free to launch your own CA. | | |
| ▲ | sam_lowry_ 2 days ago | parent [-] | | No-no, I would rather go back to the good old HTTP/1.1. P.S. JS injection into TCP packets and other meddling with passthrough data should be banned legally, not technically via encryption. | | |
| ▲ | soco 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I wish you good luck in court trying to get compensation for the damage you've got through a JS injection attack. Because people prefer to lock their valuables instead of constantly having to identify and sue thieves. | | |
| ▲ | sam_lowry_ 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Not court, regulation. Wanna be a carrier? Then don't meddle with traffic. Otherwise, you are liable for all the child porn and drug trade that happen to cross your boundary. | | |
| ▲ | Natfan 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | am i a carrier when i host my own wifi network? | |
| ▲ | soco 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Right, we actually agree on this. And where is regulation enforced? In courts. Who says the provider is liable? A court. This was my point: not locking your house means a lot of processing to get back to the place where you have been before - if it can ever happen. And I'd very much not go through a whole trial... | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
