| ▲ | UltraSane 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Zionism means fighting for Israeli control over more territory like the West Bank." Now that is a valid use of the term. I think the problem it that Zionism means so many different things it is nearly useless as a description. It seems more useful as a slur which has become very common in some circles. "The inertia isn't there" I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying Israel could be defeated without US assistance? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | frollogaston 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think it's valid to use the word the way that Israel's present leadership is using it. > Are you saying Israel could be defeated without US assistance? US and UK, yes. Not just cause of the weapons and money to Israel. After them, the top recipients of US foreign aid in the area are the bordering countries Egypt and Jordan, so that they don't attack. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||