I am unable to accept that it is fully local, since you have to bind your network to their cloud just to accept the EULA. [0] I have 0% trust that a subsequent unbind truly severs the link, because this is such a shady thing to require in the first place.

[0] https://community.ui.com/questions/e3d50641-5c00-4607-9723-4...

▲

varenc a day ago | parent | next [-]

I'm surprised this is required. Agreed that's shady. I wonder what their reasoning is.

But if you don't trust it, the fix is easy: just deny the Ubiquiti cameras and controller all internet access. That way no trust is required.

▲

mcculley a day ago | parent [-]

But what if I want to access my cameras remotely but not have their manufacturer access them?

	▲	avianlyric a day ago \| parent [-]
		VPN. You can even use the Wireguard VPN that all Ubiquiti routers have built in

▲

ragall 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So once you accept the EULA, it's fully local. What's your problem with that ?

	▲	MrDrMcCoy 15 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The problem I have is that the Ubiquiti camera and Dream Machine I bought were sold to me as something whose features work fully offline and that I would not have to grant any 3rd-party access to my network. I refuse to grant such access for any length of time, and cannot trust that the access will be fully revoked thereafter because Ubiquity already broke that trust by demanding access to my devices when they advertised otherwise.