| ▲ | lazide 3 hours ago |
| It is what typically all reactors get stuck on for years - or often decades. |
|
| ▲ | mpweiher 3 hours ago | parent [-] |
| I doubt it. There used to be separate construction and operating permits, and sometimes you got the building permit, built the plant and then never got the operating license. This has now been streamlined with a combined construction/operating license. If you built what you promised to build, you get to operate it. |
| |
| ▲ | devmor 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Can you give an example of a plant that has been built under this streamlined process and what kind of timeline it had? The only recent nuclear buildouts that I personally have knowledge of are expansions to existing plants and thus have a lower barrier to get going. | | |
| ▲ | lazide 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Since it was just released, that’s pretty hard to do eh? I’m familiar with the reactors built on other previous ‘expedited’ processes that ended up being anything but fast. We’ll see how it goes eh? | | |
| ▲ | devmor an hour ago | parent [-] | | If it was just released, then your claims about it are entirely hypothetical and best-case-scenario. Of course we have to "see how it goes" - there's no merit but hopefulness to your stance... | | |
| ▲ | ac29 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | A change in regulations is not a meritless argument, it's useful information | |
| ▲ | lazide an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Lol, that every prior process has gone this way (including ‘express’ processes) surely has no value? Uh huh. |
|
|
|
|
