| ▲ | vslira 3 hours ago | |||||||
What’s the meaning of skeuomorphic design for a generation that has never worked with the original physical artifacts they’re based on, though? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Telaneo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Consistency. Even if you've never held a telephone receiver, if it means 'call' in one place, it's very likely to mean the same thing in another. We could be using random hieroglyphs to the same ends, but people seem to always make their own (barring a few exceptions, like the hamburger menu). It's probably a better idea to use something with some grounding in reality rather than make your own from nothing, since doing that is hard, even for actual designers. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | marginalia_nu an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They create a consistent design language. Do you need to know the meaning of the latin words manus (hand) and facere (to make) to understand the English words manual (by hand), factory (place which makes things) and manufacture (to assemble)? Do we need new words now that Latin comprehension is dwindling? Not really. Language works by metaphor, even if the thing you're alluding to doesn't exist anymore. | ||||||||
| ▲ | petilon 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It doesn't really matter if they haven't used the original physical artifacts. If it looks physical you can figure out how to use it based on your knowledge of other physical objects you have used in your life. Of course if you display for example, a spin dial like old telephones that has a particularly quirky way to use, them this doesn't apply. | ||||||||