Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

▲

mig39 3 hours ago

The article praises the UI, but isn't Windows 2000 using the Windows 95/98 UI with a different kernel?

▲

petilon 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Hold on, don't give cred it to Windows 95. The beveled 3D look was the invention of NeXT. Windows 95 copied everything from them. https://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/openstep42

	▲	2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

minkeymaniac 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The different kernel for 95/98 was NT 4... Windows 2000 was unified, same UI for Consumer and Server

▲

daveoc64 an hour ago | parent [-]

There is no version of Windows 2000 for consumers.

Windows Me was the nearest consumer release (2000 came out in 1999, Me in 2000), and did share most of the same UI, but was based on Windows 98.

Windows XP was the first version of Windows to ship with the same codebase for both consumer and business.

	▲	minkeymaniac 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Windows 2000 Professional was the non server edition no? That's the one I was running AFAIK. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_2000#Editions But you might be right by meaning consumer is non business user.. I also ran ME for about 2 weeks lol

▲

flanked-evergl 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> I liked the UIs of the entire era from 3.0 to 2000, really. I'm mostly using Windows 2000 as an example here because it runs so well in QEMU/KVM and that allows me to easily take screenshots.