| ▲ | ToucanLoucan 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> When did I say it was working perfectly? "This isn’t a vulnerability, there are endless gore websites. ChatGPT is replying to a prompt, there is nothing “Spontaneously” about this." I mean it's not verbatim but that's a pretty solid read on what you did say. > The transformer was designed to attend to relevant pieces of context and generate new ones that match the pattern. OpenAI in particular was doing that work without guardrails, then attempted to bolt on "content filters," which in my opinion just can't work in a rigorous way. Yes. That's the criticism being made, among others, in the piece you replied to to belittle. > So, yeah, working as designed. Maybe not as intended, because these things are somewhat resistant to the host's intent when the prompter is hostile. What is hostile here!? Do you have any idea how many emails I've sent without attachments over the years? And I'm highly technically adept, humans just forget things sometimes. If you ask for an image to be restored and fail to attach it, what sane software engineer looks at a failure mode in that scenario where the model replies with uncensored gore and violence and is like "yeah that's fine, ship it"? I swear some of you AI folks talk like you have never been on planet Earth, good grief. Touch some grass. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kisper 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You seem to be focused on the fact that this is a crap-tastic example of the future of AI that has been promised to us. That’s a real good example to be angry. Don’t be angry at the rest of us because LLM stacks are working like they always have and always will. That’s what we’re all pointing out. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||