Indeed. I myself am on Doom Emacs but I've increasingly been thinking of moving over to vanilla Emacs. I'm a bit worried about the transition period due to all the keybind differences but I'm sure it's not too bad.

▲

bryanlarsen 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Tell your agent what parts of Doom Emacs you actually use, and ask it to build a minimal init.el containing only those parts. You're probably only using ~2% of Doom, so the resulting init.el will likely only be a few hundred lines, and most of those lines will be comments and key bindings.

It won't be a perfect transition, but it will make it a lot smoother.

	▲	killix an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]

▲

fridder 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm also a Doom user, albeit a new one. What is making you consider the switch?

	▲	quibono 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Don't get me wrong, I'm loving Doom and have used it full time for a few years now. But over time I've started being uncomfortable with the fact that I don't fully understand the editor, don't fully appreciate the difference between what comes in as part of vanilla Emacs and as a Doom feature, and I feel like I am depending on a huge bunch of code and configuration I might not really even need. Selfishly I wasn't willing to spend the time to master Emacs proper back then, but with the LLM craze now I find it much easier to hack on my configs.