| ▲ | apatheticonion 5 hours ago |
| I use DeepSeek every day (via VSCode Insiders and Zed Editor). It's very affordable and, while it's slightly behind Claude (not sure how far behind Fable), it suits my working style well. I'm not using unsupervised multi-agent workflows and don't need a library of skills files - I'm writing most of the code and leaning on AI to help with mundane tasks - like; - generating types for APIs - generating boilerplate based on existing code - improving existing code (adding error handling, timeouts, things like that) - Writing SQL repository boilerplate / queries - Creating implementations against hand written tests - Helping me understand and implement APIs from third party libraries - Writing documentation I've spent like $2 in the last month and have used over 100 million tokens. It's doubled my productivity and unlocked work that I could not have done before. As an Australian, I'm not sure that I care about the safety of my data when it comes to LLMs. US companies already stole scores of data to train their models on and it's hard to imagine they suddenly grew some integrity. I'll care when regulators step in, until then it's out of my control so I'll just use the best price-to-productivity product available. |
|
| ▲ | hodgehog11 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| In terms of price-to-productivity, nothing will beat DeepSeek right now. For what you have described, all of the existing frontier models will perform well (probably about the same even). If you expanded the list to very hard research tasks, Fable was so far ahead of the others that it doesn't even deserve debate. If you are a researcher doing something involving scientific computation or mathematics that wasn't rejected by the guard rails, and you were using Fable, that week was probably your most productive week ever. A couple of my PhD students effectively finished their current projects in that period by getting Fable to chew on it for 30 hours straight (not sure how I feel about that). |
| |
| ▲ | steelframe 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Makes me wonder what the value of a PhD is. | |
| ▲ | Cakez0r 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Mimo 2.5 pro is the best intelligence / dollar | | |
| ▲ | atty 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | In most cases it seems (at least to me and colleagues) to be turning out that picking best intelligence is a better option than picking better intelligence / dollar, assuming you can afford the cost. At least on interesting problems. If you’re doing generic web dev work, probably not the case. | | |
| ▲ | hodgehog11 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Absolutely agree with this. As Louis Rossmann recently pointed out, it's the difference between a correct answer and a wrong answer; the correct answer is worth a good amount, while the wrong answer is worth nothing. Under this metric, for harder tasks, the most intelligent model is best per dollar. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | grafmax an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| IMO US vs Chinese data vacuuming is a false choice. One of the main benefits of these open weights models is that you can get the privacy and cost savings by hosting your own model in cloud infrastructure. Open weights models are only 4.5 months behind closed weight ones. The fact that US considers propping its flagship technology by blacklisting competitors demonstrates how small the US competitive advantage really is. |
| |
| ▲ | neuroelectron an hour ago | parent [-] | | The USA has an entire economic system to financialize your personal data and obfuscate your privacy. China can just sniff on their citizens API Calls, and use that to distill models. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | godelski 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > As an Australian, I'm not sure that I care about the safety of my data when it comes to LLMs. US companies already stole scores of data
I'm not sure I understand this. I'm not defending the US, but isn't your data being in more hands worse?Also, isn't Australia in a more contentious situation with China? Them being more allied with the US and all? Not to mention the whole nuclear sub issue. Having data stolen is shitty either way but isn't data taken by an adversarial country a worse situation? |
| |
| ▲ | fjdjshsh 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Latinamerican here.
When you talk about "adversarial country" I think of the USA (they can kidnap a president, kill people on boats without a trial, etc) and not China.
YMMV for different regions. | | |
| ▲ | cwnyth 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yes, that's why they specifically were talking to an Australian person. |
| |
| ▲ | apatheticonion 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If I spoke freely about how I feel about the US right now and the direct personal impact of policies implemented by the recent administration, I'd be denied entry into the country to visit friends later this year. It is inconsequential if the US or China have my data, both will misuse it and I am powerless to protect myself from that fact. Not using LLMs presents a bigger threat to my career than protecting my data. | | |
| ▲ | godelski 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > If I spoke freely about how I feel about the US right now
If you read my comment as defending the US then you've misread. Also, you're probably just as pissed as 60% of Americans > It is inconsequential if the US or China have my data
Sure it does. The way each distributes data between government and industry has some differences. So too does the different disinformation campaigns each country is running against Australia.But the main point is really that 2 > 1. 1 country scraping your data is bad. 2 is worse. |
| |
| ▲ | stephen_g 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Most Aussies aren't really worried about China... China remains our largest trading partner, and polling shows less than half of Australians think the AUKUS alliance (which includes the nuclear subs) makes our region safer. | |
| ▲ | florkbork 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Re Australia vs China https://youtu.be/sgspkxfkS4k?si=JgnhenF0qeTZXeGS basically explains the situation. While having data/code stolen isn't ideal, there is a certain point where you need to assume it's already out there. There's actually more probability of harm from shady US companies imo, because people are less suspicious about data sovereignty | |
| ▲ | technion 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As an Australian.. politically I need to worry about business data touching China. It will come up at a Risk Advisory Committee meeting as a serious issue. In actual personal practice, no. China having my data presents no actual impact to me, America will do things that impact me. | | |
| ▲ | nujabe 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Exactly. And I feel the same way as a US citizen. China is mostly interested in geopolitical stuff and getting an economic advantage, plus they have no jurisdiction in the US. Your data in the hands of the US government however could potentially land you in prison. |
| |
| ▲ | hodgehog11 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Historically speaking, the US might even be a larger risk to Australia than China is. The US alliance goes back a long way, and so does the opposition to US influence. Since the Whitlam government, MPs are generally fearful of US retaliation, rendering much of our politics hostage to US influence. Of course, some PMs have openly embraced the US so this feeling isn't universal. But many of our issues are directly tied to the US. China has been far more beneficial to Australia by comparison, with the downside being the encroaching influence of CCP propaganda. Many of our strengths are tied to our relationships with Southeast Asia. Paul Keating has famously declared US as an "aggressive ally", "our colonial masters", AUKUS as our "worst international decision", and that "our future is in Southeast Asia". This was under Biden too. So the situation is much more complicated, and the feelings on the ground right now is that the US are not our friends (of course, the CCP is not great either). | | | |
| ▲ | 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | sandworm101 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | China is not digging through my social media in order to find a reason to cut my grant funding. China isnt going to pull me over for speeding in montana only to examine my phone to see whether i am maga enough to get off with a warning. And china isnt at o'hare security scanning for anyone with skin darker than freshly fallen snow. China may be evil, but it is a far away evil that doesnt have a physical impact on my day to day. The other evil is much closer to home. Even if it is not the biggest, the crocodile closest to the canoe is always more concerning than the one still on the bank. | |
| ▲ | est 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > isn't your data being in more hands worse? > Having data stolen is shitty Fun fact: Deepseek can be hosted by third parties even yourself. |
|
|
| ▲ | cg5280 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I second this. I’ve been using it a lot (with OpenCode) for personal projects. It’s intelligent enough at a tiny fraction of the cost of Claude or Codex. |
|
| ▲ | fraXis 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How are you accessing their API? Through OpenRouter, or direct? Are you using DeepSeek v4 Pro? $2 seems a lot cheaper than my own experience accessing them through OpenRouter for over 100 million tokens, but I am using OpenRouter to access v4 pro. |
| |
| ▲ | crazylogger 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Cache hit rate dominates your total cost calculation for long agent session, and it largely depends on the provider. Deepseek's native deployment is probably much better than third party in this regard. For v4 pro it's a whopping >100x price difference between normal input vs. cached input tokens. | |
| ▲ | apatheticonion 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I am using Flash and accessing the API directly via vscode insiders and occasionally Zed (it's buggy but I keep coming back to it because I want it to succeed). Unless you need enterprise multi-model management, I don't see the point in OpenRouter as it just adds cost overhead and you can just self-host an open router alternative (LiteLLM, Bifrost, etc). Running an LLM gateway locally is kind of nice as it allows you to normalize your configurations against your internal gateway - but I haven't really needed to. | |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Pro is substantially more expensive than flash. In addition, there's wide variance in price with DeepSeek themselves providing the cheapest tokens last I checked (but they train on them). Caching policy also varies by provider. TTL can be as low as 5 minutes or as high as 24 hours and reading from the cache might or might not reset the timer. Whether or not you get a hit makes (IIRC) a 10x (edit: it's actually 50x) price difference in the case of DeepSeek themselves. |
|
|
| ▲ | globalnode 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Using laws to ban competitors is just economic warfare thats all. Its got nothing to do with "national security", thats just the reason they give us normies. You should be safe in Australia since they actually need to be friends with China. |
| |
| ▲ | kingforaday 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > You should be safe in Australia since they actually need to be friends with China. As a non-Australian, I enjoyed very much reading about Australia in a book by Tim Marshall titled "The Power of Geography". I didn't quite realize just how vulnerable they become with China's ambitions and expanse in the South Pacific due to their reliance on vital sea lanes for trade with its Asian partners. After reading that book, I can appreciate your comment much more. | |
| ▲ | re-thc 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Using laws to ban competitors is just economic warfare thats all. Its got nothing to do with "national security" Economic safety is 1 angle of national security. They're not "wrong". | |
| ▲ | p-e-w 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What? Every country has the right to freely decide which companies are permitted to operate under its jurisdiction, and exercising that right isn’t “warfare” of any kind. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | proxysna 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been using deepseek for some development at home and it is really good for the price. It is at the point where i am ok with using it as a tool that i can rely on and not an expensive gadget with flaky uptimes. |
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | Rover222 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Developers claiming their valuable data was “stolen” to train models is so dramatic. |