| ▲ | fearmerchant 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's more like once you figure out how to make a really good lamp then producing lots of lamps will be profitable. But the lamps are currently suboptimal so we'll be in the red until that time. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | strken 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's more like you have a business making engines, each generation of engine has eventually turned out to be profitable over its lifespan, but each generation has an exponentially increasing R&D cost and your customers will switch from the old engines to a competitor if they don't like the newest generation. You're stuck racing against your competitors with the distinct possibility that your R&D costs will outgrow the market demand, and you can't stop because otherwise your customers will stop investing in your dead end tech and switch. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ndiddy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
OpenAI won't be able to cut R&D spend and collect rent on their existing models as long as the Chinese models keep up the pace of being ~6 months behind them for a fraction of the price. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rwmj 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
And if you wait 12 months, someone will be giving away lamps for free that work just as well. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | darth_avocado 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
And then someone will come up with lamp pro max and you’ll be out of business. You realize why R&D exists in tech companies even though it’s a cost center right? | |||||||||||||||||||||||