kangalioo 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How does Pangram detect this? How do we know this is any more reliable than just asking any HN user to judge a text for AI signs, i.e. how is this more authoritative than the comments you're responding to?

computerphage 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.pangram.com/research/how-it-works

▲

raincole 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> How do we know this

We don't. Pangram is HN's astrology. It has 99.99% accuracy (according to Pangram.)

	▲	computerphage 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		They claim it has a very low false-positive rate, which is meaningfully more nuanced than "accuracy". "Detect AI-generated content with 99.98% accuracy." -pangram themselves

▲

drob518 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Oops… gotta say that I agree with the general message of the article, though.

▲

computerphage 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Why do you agree?

	▲	drob518 26 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Because I think that a world that is increasingly isolated by technology and divided by ideology is craving authentic personal interaction with real humans. And I think that’s something AI will not be able to duplicate because it requires real human beings.