What makes lore better or worth considering... when svn and git never failed me...

wongarsu 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Git does great with text files, but game development contains a lot of binary assets (textures, videos, 3d models) and correspondingly huge repos. git-lfs tries to patch around that, but that makes a complex tool that creatives struggle to understand even more complex. Perforce is a pretty popular solution, and was used by Epic in the past

▲

frollogaston 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Have to think they're doing this out of a real need, given they were already using Perforce and must've considered Git too. It's also not like 2010s when version control was a hyped thing.

▲

koolala 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is there no git trick to turn off version control on non-text files but still store them? How does Lore handle them better?

	▲	LtdJorge 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You still want version control, and locking so that two artists don't concurrently edit the same asset.

▲

bpicolo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It’s optimized for projects—including games and entertainment—that combine code with large binary assets, and caters for the needs of developers and artists alike.

▲

pdpi 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

When you have a game that weighs in at 100GB, only a tiny fraction of that is built from code. The rest of it is binary assets that most VCSs struggle with. What makes this worth considering is the fact that they designed it to handle binary assets.

▲

hootz 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Apparently, how it handles binaries when developing games.