I have no problem with this. If the AI has access to the funding and schedule data, it will probably give a more honest answer that the humans. And in reality, nobody in congress is going to take the time to read the report anyways. They will just vote the way they are told.

▲

FatherOfCurses 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You're assuming the AI will not be given any instructions to produce the report with a certain data bias.

▲

margalabargala 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That only matters to the extent the report is read, though.

▲

creaghpatr 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If so, that would be auditable (in theory; whether it would be audited in practice, probably not).

▲

dgellow 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Audits have literally no impact: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_Offi...

▲

galleywest200 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How many audits has the Pentagon failed in recent years?

	▲	warkdarrior 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's true that Pentagon audits failed to account for hundreds of billions of dollars. https://econofact.org/factbrief/has-the-pentagon-failed-its-... But I am sure future audits will succeed in tracking down all of the prompts used for AI-generated reports. /s

▲

cyanydeez 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Me either, bullshit vs bullshit AI is exactly the same. It's not like this administration was going to produce anything of merit anyway, so why not just go as quickly as possible to the bullshit instead of this 2weeks song and dance.