| ▲ | FrustratedMonky 5 hours ago |
| Literally on the timeline for AI-2027. https://ai-2027.com/ <edit> AI-2027, not Project 2027 |
|
| ▲ | cyanydeez 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| ok, first, this isn't superhuman AI; this is slop production at scale. we could do these with markov chains decades ago. The only difference now is the slop looks critically better, but there's no quality accounting. |
| |
| ▲ | FrustratedMonky 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | In AI-2027, there are many stages before superhuman AI. Military dependence on AI was one of them. This dependence creates incentive to do anything to not slow down, including ignoring any safety concerns. | | |
| ▲ | ameliaquining 25 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I read that prediction as being about using AI for mission-critical stuff, which this isn't really. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | FrustratedMonky 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Not sure why the downvote. Part of AI-2027, one of the early steps, was government dependance on AI for routine jobs. They become dependent on AI, and thus less willing to slow down or put on any guard rails. Because they can't live without it, they keep accelerating. |
| |
| ▲ | lelandfe 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Likely because they said Project 2027 which is something different | | |
| ▲ | FrustratedMonky 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Did not realize there was a follow on to Project 2025, called 2027. | | |
| ▲ | lelandfe 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | evokes something different/doesn't exist At minimum that link does not describe a project and does not use that Proper Noun |
|
|
|