| ▲ | Pragmata 7 hours ago |
| So this basically means we will have a near opus level model able to be run locally in the next couple of months right? QWEN 3.6 27b is already pretty good, but it should be possible to get a better option now that runs in the same hardware, right? |
|
| ▲ | XCSme 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Which Opus? GLM-5.2 is already close to Opus-4.7 level: https://aibenchy.com/compare/anthropic-claude-opus-4-7-mediu... |
| |
| ▲ | XCSme 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh, or you meant a smaller model than GLM-5.2 with similar capabilities? | | |
| ▲ | segmondy 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Probably not. Qwen3.(5|6)-27B seems like an "accidental freak". I'm not even sure they know what they did to create that. A decent amount of the team members left after that, so unfortunately, we might not be seeing another small model that packs such a punch for a while. Hopefully the team is studying their entire training recipe for that and is able to replicate. If they are, then a 50-70B dense model might give us such capabilities... | |
| ▲ | Pragmata 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yep! I'm running things locally on a RTX5080 + RTX1060 + 64GB DDR5 ram, and would love to get a more capable model if possible! QWEN3.6 27b is pretty good, but i can still notice some spots where it's not as good as the frontier models. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | segmondy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Why wait for the next few months? There are plenty of better models that you can run today locally. Qwen3.5-397B beats Qwen3.6-27B. MiniMax2.7 is a longrun horizon monster. (I haven't given 3 much of a try yet). KimiK2.6/2.7, MiMoV2.5/MiMoV2.5-Pro and GLM5.1 will wreck Qwen3.6-27B any day on any task. |
| |
