| ▲ | simianwords 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No models are subsidised -- there are lots of third party hosting services that will still run at breakeven/profit. (except Deepseek after discount) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stymaar 6 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> No models are subsidised We have no proof in either direction, it's not like we had access to their financial numbers in details. And the pricing itself muddies the water, as input tokens that are already in the KV cache are practically free for the provider, whereas other tokens are expensive. So they could still make money overall thanks to people having multi-turn conversation (and as such, paying multiple times for the same token), but lose money on actual compute done. > there are lots of third party hosting services that will still run at breakeven/profit. How can you be sure that they are making profit directly from token price, and are not billing at marginal cost (i.e. electricity price, without counting the cost of the GPUs) and aiming to make a profit later on from the valuable training data that they are collecting in the process? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||