groundzeros2015 8 hours ago

Applying even an ounce of argumentative empathy will make you more convincing and psychologically healthier.

arbitrary_name 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

it is extremely difficult to do in cases like this. again, why are we pulling the sensors? why not leave them in place and stop paying for maintenance?

why not find alternate funding mechanisms?

because we know who these people are, and what their motives are. they show us time and and time again.

empathy is something to be used against us.

	▲	groundzeros2015 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Well. Even if you want to attribute a bad motive that would give more clarity. Maybe the people involved in these projects have expressed disagreement with the admin, so they don’t want to pay them. What’s so important about these particular sensors that any change in resourcing is a categorical evil?

▲

caconym_ 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How would you explain it? It seems either entirely ideological on the part of its architects, cynically designed to appeal to a political base that has been inculcated with that ideology, or cynically designed to enrich its architects' political and business allies under cover of appealing to a political base that has been inculcated with that ideology. Possibly some combination of those three. But the core issue is opposition to and misrepresentation of scientific consensus, on the part of an administration that has referred to its political opponents as "the enemy from within".