| ▲ | idle_zealot 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
I don't think a private company could possibly swing that, but that general arrangement would be welcome as part of a copyright reform package. Like the mandatory licensing we did for song covers back when we cared more about pretending that copyright was meant to balance art and profits. You want to train on something? Fine, no need to negotiate 1,000,000,000 licenses, that would be impossible. Just check the registry for ownership and wire some cash. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | duncangh a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Interested to read more about this particular crossroads of copyright case law. Also does the last sentence reflect (at least in part) what you describe (in partial jest?) in the last sentence? Iirc artists previously had to call to get permission from original owner of songs samples and I remember hearing anecdotes like Kanye promising someone he wouldn’t swear in a song with the sample of it were used (and I think most of ye’s samples constitute fair use but not sure). Anyways, you seem knowledgeable to joke about this ultra niche so thought I would ask ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | paul7986 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
And thinking about all our daily conversations that include data about businesses we patronize.. that is data / content AI can use too. Content we should be paid for alongside our pics, songs, videos and any human content we create that helps AI stay relevant! | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||