I have my qualms with Anthropic/Claude but they've also had to scale unfathomably fast and that is just hard to do regardless.

▲

simplyluke 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Yes but many of the challenges directly contradict the idea that "coding is a solved problem"

▲

Closi 2 days ago | parent [-]

Not really.

Coding is probably solved, at least to a large extent, but that doesn't mean engineering is solved too.

This is like someone saying that the wright brothers solved sustained/powered human flight, and another person saying "well if that's the case, why do planes still crash? obviously flight isn't solved.". Well, there are always improvements, but planes can fly and llm's can code.

	▲	smoe 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		"I think we're going to start to see the title 'software engineer' go away. And I think it's just going to be maybe builder, maybe product manager, maybe we'll keep the title as a vestigial thing." — Boris Cherny They been claiming more than just “coding is solved” for a while now. https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-claude-code-founde...

▲

codeflo 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Regardless of what? Programming is solved, I hear, with all the 100x productivity PhD-level automated coding loops they have going. Don't make excuses for them when they disprove their own bullshit.

▲

2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]