| ▲ | Jcampuzano2 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I know this is not always true. But the same people who like cursor still are the same people who are less familiar with the terminal. And I don't know what it is but it feels the less familiar you are with a terminal, the less skilled you tend to be. Definitely not a 100% case. But has been common in my experience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | yoyohello13 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think it's more of a sign of a good engineer. I know a number of engineers that are good and don't really work with the terminal. On the other hand, every engineer I've worked with who was a 'terminal guy' was great. I think being good with the terminal is a signal that the person is willing to 'dig in' and understand stuff at a lower level. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | w29UiIm2Xz 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I strongly disagree with the parent commenter. I use cursor because it shows its thinking with more detail and much faster than Claude. That way, I can stop it in its tracks if went off the rails. Claude seems slow to me. No relation to engineering caliber. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | digitaltrees an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totally disagree. I find people still using cursor or other IDE centric flows want to review the code and be more interactive. Claude Code and Codex push agent autonomy and speed. Sorry but they go off the rails too much. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dropofwill an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cursor has a terminal based app that’s just as good as any of the other mainstream ones… | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | anthonypasq an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
why do annoying engineers have such a weird fetish/superiority complex about the terminal. Its an inherently inferior UI. Theres absolutely nothing you can do in a terminal that you cant do in a GUI, and every TUI is just jumping through insane hoops to support functionality thats trivial in a GUI. Why on earth would you want to look at a code diff in a terminal? Why on earth would you want to use weird bespoke keyboard shortcuts to navigate sub-agents in a TUI session. Why on earth would i not want the ability to open/edit a file manually in the tool im using to write code. can someone please explain this to me? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | anthonypasq an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
why do annoying engineers has such a weird fetish/superiority complex about the terminal. Its an inherently inferior UI. Theres absolutely nothing you can do in a terminal that you cant do in a GUI, and every TUI is just jumping through insane hoops to support functionality thats trivial in a GUI. And guess what, you can just open a terminal in cursor! who knew!? Why on earth would you want to look at a code diff in a terminal? Why on earth would you want to use weird bespoke keyboard shortcuts to navigate sub-agents in a TUI session. can someone please explain this to me? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Pxtl an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Honestly the TUI in most of these coding agents is so fancy I have trouble thinking of them as "terminal". I use Pi Coding Agent and the fact that it's terminal means it's easy to run inside something properly sandboxed in a YOLO mode using normal bash commands instead of relying on individually sandboxed tools. Once I got the tmux settings for proper scrolling and whatnot it feels fine. Honestly the TUI of tmux is the one that really enrages me - so much complexity for just "I want to switch terminals on my remote". | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||