Cursor was nice when I was still meticulously hand coding my stack, fantastic autocomplete. With today's top models, I barely write code myself, just review commits. Cursor eats Opus credits like there is no tomorrow. Composer has been a net negative in my experience. All in on Codex with GPT 5.5 on high using /fast.

▲

agluszak 6 hours ago | parent [-]

IMO composer 2.5 is pretty good, and the $20 Cursor plan gives you _way_ more tokens than Codex/Claude code/Antigravity

	▲	nerdsniper 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I seem to get a lot more tokens for my $ with the $200 plan from Anthropic or OpenAI than I do from the $200 plan from Cursor. Lately I use Cursor with DeepSeek API, and OpenAI subscription through their Codex App.
	▲	arend321 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Not my experience. Maybe an hour of top model use on the $20 plan, then Composer 2.5 which needs constant hand holding.
	▲	Der_Einzige 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Only cursor employees could continue to spread this idea that composer 2.5 isn’t total garbage.