Remix.run Logo
barredo 9 hours ago

>> SpaceX told investors during the IPO process that it sees an addressable market for AI products worth $26 trillion, roughly equivalent to U.S. GDP.

I very much can imagine a future documentary in a few years. With the host asking the audience: "Where were the signs?"

supertroop 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well the TAM can match GDP if GDP evaporates!

thisisit 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's the number AI boosters are spreading too "The TAM for AI is all of humanity - this includes every person and every company. So, imagine this huge pile of future revenue." I agree that TAM is likely huge but is SpaceX most suitable to capture that TAM? Unlikely. But for now everyone wants in on the AI hype train and FOMO of losing out one any company in the AI space.

In the long term most markets are duopoly with small competitors. And personally I see OpenAI and Anthropic duking it out rather than SpaceX.

fred_is_fred 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe they can monetize and trade AI tokens like Enron was going to trade bandwidth?

dgellow 28 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Market maker for AI tokens. Now that’s an original idea!

Joel_Mckay 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Enron was never audacious enough betting every US man, woman, and child will spend $28k/year on their generally nonprofitable business with one exception -- Starlink.

Patrick Boyle covered the SPCX trajectory fairly well... =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKXgeNwNRJ4

fred_is_fred 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This feels very 1999.

csours 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Signal and noise. Lots of noise. SO much noise.

To be clear, I don't know which part is signal and which part is noise any better than anyone else.

javier2 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I know this is just nonsense wish thinking, but apparently the investors disagree and I have zero clue when they will also stop giving Musk their money.

caconym_ 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I think the bump since IPO can be explained at least partially by low float not meeting demand. I've seen a lot of accounts from retail investors who entered the lotteries saying they only got a small fraction of what they wanted, hence demand is kept artificially high. Probably intentionally, since it essentially allows the optimists to dictate the price.

(edit: This is not at all unique to spacex, of course, but given the nature of Musk's companies and their "fans" it's logical that they would employ this strategy. They are also doing a staggered unlock to avoid upsetting the market when insiders start dumping their shares.)