Remix.run Logo
sph 4 hours ago

> I think there’s actually a sharp contrast with John Carmack here. Fabrice might be smarter and faster but Carmack is perhaps a better software engineer.

There’s few things I find more pathetic than trying really hard to show who’s best and ranking things that have no business being ranked.

You will find humans are n-dimensional and elude these simplistic categories.

yaantc 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, ranking requires reducing to a single dimension where all interesting things are multi-dimensions. This is a lossy process, which often tells more about the one(s) doing the ranking than what's ranked.

sph 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I was thinking of sport players that have their stats laid out as a radar chart. One might be average on defense, but a world class striker. Is he better than a world class defender but average striker? And even that is a convenient and lossy approximation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_chart

lambdaone 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Carmack and Bellard are both wizards, and trying to rank them is a fool's errand. Let's appreciate them both!

anthk 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Carmack it's a better engineer, but Bellard it's a better thinker and innovator. To each its own.