That's like asking of the Internet "communication for whom?"

The vast majority of bytes sent over the internet are neither from nor to a human writer or reader.

It turns out that humans are not a necessary component in communication, although that proposition would have sounded very weird even 50 years ago.

Why is it so hard to imagine that humans may not be a necessary component in the economy?

I feel like I might be missing the point of your comment.

> The vast majority of bytes sent over the internet are neither from nor to a human writer or reader.

I don't believe that's right. Without even breaking down the remaining percentage, aren't the majority of bytes for video?

> It turns out that humans are not a necessary component in communication, although that proposition would have sounded very weird even 50 years ago.

But these bytes are in service of a human? Unless we're talking like intermediate steps which seems kind of vacuous.

Meanwhile whales sing to each other, birds too, bees are dancing to communicate food sources...

But if a large number of bytes were being transmitted on the internet from no one and to no human benefit, "communication for whom?" seems like a very reasonable question.