|
| ▲ | lisper 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I want a robust field of competitors that allows supply to rise to meet demand, and I would like the USA to be one of the competitors. I would like the people who do the work to earn a living wage. I do not want to benefit from overseas slave labor. If that means I have to pay more, so be it. |
| |
| ▲ | tartoran 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | US should do something very advanced domestically. Not sure if the US can compete on RAM and Chips within the current state of affairs. |
|
|
| ▲ | hagbard_c 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They're already expensive. Increasing production capacity tends to bring down prices, not raise them. |
| |
| ▲ | hagbard_c 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Could the down-voters explain their votes? In what does the observation of increased production capacity leading to lower prices insult their sensitivities that they felt the need to press that down-vote arrow? Surely you realise that the market works by balancing supply versus demand until some equilibrium is achieved? That demand partly - but not wholly - depends on price? Is it just that you (plural or singular in case of one person controlling more than one down-voting account) can't imagine a domestically-produced good to lead to lower market prices? If not, what else is it that makes my comment so irksome that it needs to be greyed out? |
|
