| ▲ | lambda 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you believe the benchmarks, Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B already outperforms Claude 4 Opus. Now, there's a bit of a degree to which some of the open source models do some benchmaxxing, and bigger models with more params may always feel like they have more depth. But anyhow, right now you have something that is arguably comparable to Claude 4 Opus on your laptop. I can't really compare myself because I never used it. It looks like Claude 4 Opus is still available on OpenRouter, so you could try it out and compare yourself if you're interested. It will likely always be the case that there are proprietary cloud models that are more powerful than what you can run on a laptop. You can just do a whole lot more with terabytes of VRAM on multi-GPU clusters than you can do on a laptop. So for folks who must have the most capable, you're probably not going to want to leave Anthropic. But right now, the models you can run on your laptop are comparable to the cloud models that were popular when vibecoding and Claude Code first took off. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MrScruff 3 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You really need to take the benchmarks with a massive pinch of salt. I’ve been testing local LLMs since the original llama and there’s nothing I’ve tried that is in the same category as Opus. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||