Not only that but the author has appeared on Joe Rogan - that tells me all I need to know.

That's a silly statement. There's been plenty of people who went on there to try to talk sense into him.

Rogan is obviously pro psychedelics, and was even featured in the oval office during the recent Ibogaine approval signing. I think it's worth noting if this N=1 "study" has any association with such an obviously biased and influential individual.

	▲	boxed 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I mean.. I've seen the preliminary studies on treatment resistent PTSD so I'm also pro psychedelics, because I'm anti suicide. Dismissing this "study" (really a case file) because of the N=1 and the shady journal seems like a stronger position than bringing in Rogan. Talking about Rogan just looks like partisan posturing.