> Btw this was initially coded without AI, but I've used it for the recent clean up and features

Then it makes sense to update the submission title. To me it reads as if the project was written completely without the help of AI (which might be a quality badge to some), but it is not 100% true then.

Anyhow, cool project ;)

▲

martiano 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Thanks! I get your point about AI, but I think it's fair to say it's almost 100% AI free. I worked on it for ~15 months, vs 1 week now with AI. Previous results were quite similar

	▲	mywittyname 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> 1 week now with AI 1 week is enough to build out a full-featured application with AI if you know what you're doing and are using proper tooling. You may want to use a better metric to quantify what AI tooling did in the project.
	▲	socalgal2 an hour ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		My experience is 1 week of AI can = a year of by hand development.
	▲	gspr 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> think it's fair to say it's almost 100% AI free. So write "almost without AI" in the title, then!
	▲	applfanboysbgon 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I am interested in hand-crafted software, and it feels deceptive when you put "no AI" in the title only to reveal there was. If you try to minimise its impact after, one wonders, if the impact was so minimal, why it was necessary. If you worked on it for 15 months without generated code, vs. 1 week with, why not finish the job? What was the purpose of introducing generated code in the last week, and could you not have taken a little more time to do it by hand given you already invested so much time into it?