| ▲ | aktau 10 hours ago | |
I think Neovim itself has been stabilizing quite a bit in terms of upgrade breakage. A common reason for breakage is/was:
But:
The latest example of #1 is vim.pack, which is a plugin manager similar to vim-plug, mini.deps (vim.pack is based on mini.deps), lazy et cetera.I can remember removing vim-commentary (from tpope) a while ago because Neovim included something like it in the main distribution. Granted, that specific plugin never broke because it uses the stable viml API. | ||
| ▲ | QwenGlazer9000 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Yeah the lack of basic features in core meant core functionality was forced to use plugins with varying levels of documentation and commitments to stability (in some cases sending breaking changes before the supported neovim version even reached the arch repos). I'm glad to see neovim is improving in that aspect. | ||