| ▲ | michaelbuckbee 8 hours ago | |
I ran a quick eval to see what this looks like qualitatively vs just calling Opus 4.7 or GPT 5.5 directly. As expected, Fusion was 7x slower and 4x the cost. This isn't a knock against it, just that it I think this places Fusion into a "use it only when you need it" category. | ||
| ▲ | nielsole 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Sounds like fusion would be a really good distillation target? | ||
| ▲ | IanCal 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Which models were you using under this? If you used the quality default as exists in the interface, it makes sense that it was ~4x the cost as it'd be 3 frontier models judged by one of those. The idea would be to use fusion with simpler, cheaper models. | ||
| ▲ | galsapir 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
yeah its really counterintuitive i think; i.e, getting the right framework and structure for this to work probably isn't trivial, models really hate playing well together. i wonder how their version would fair in real world use. | ||
| ▲ | jimmypk 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
[flagged] | ||