as much as I feel for the maintainers here, this sort of (again) puts the spotlight on our collective dependence on a handful of individuals basically working for free _with no backup_. Most normal organizations stagger vacations to avoid these things. Most normal organizations _have_ to do this, because their customers require it. Here, we're all customers of curl, but not really. It's a weird, IMO unhealthy, twilight zone that isn't good for anybody. And it surprises - and saddens - me that not even friggin curl has the financial muscles to have somebody on-call for one month...

You'd be surprised to learn this about free and open source software, but if a maintainer is unavailable, you have both full rights and full source code to... wait for it... fix it yourself (or pay someone to)!

There is something unhealthy in this relationship only if you project "no warranty" into unrealistic expectations.

They do, he said at the end if you have a support contract then they will respond and deal with security issues.

I guess the whole point of the article is to show that people should buy a support contract if they need support.

They do.

> Everyone with a paid support contracts will of course still get full and appropriate service even during this period.

It does. The article clearly says that if you have a paid support contract they will be on-call as per usual.

And I'm assuming you're not going to pay for them to have that someone on-call, even though you're worried about this scenario

> And it surprises - and saddens - me that not even friggin curl has the financial muscles to have somebody on-call for one month...

Is it that they can't or don't want to. I'm sure curl is popular enough that it could attract a co-maintainer if it wanted to. Of course there is a cost to that. Software projects done effectively by a single person are often more focused and designed more coherently. I'm not sure curl would be as good a product if there were multiple maintainers with potentially conflicting visions.

I wonder how far we are from the agents just maintaining the packages

Consumers, not customers

They do. You just seem to expect that it will somehow be free.

Reminder: ‘the software is provided “as is”…’.

It’s not their problem that you, or anybody else, think you are owed 24/7/365 emergency support.

The thing which bugs me is that OpenAI (which is an unprofitable company) is spending around what 100k$ per month for an completely AI generated slop called Openclaw. (All because of Hype)

I have seen there to be an more influx of open source software as people are starting to create more software with vibe-coding and other things and just open-sourcing it, which while good in OSS'ing it but its mostly less valuable as compared to the curl codebase which was created by hand and over the years improved itself.

Yet the funding is going towards making more and more (OSS/non-OSS) AI slop by people, companies and dare I say countries yet we are unable to take the same wealth and money into, say, the curl project (and the likes)

There is also an visibility issue. We all know curl and this is the state of curl. Imagine all the projects which we all don't know that much about or aware about going through same issues.