| ▲ | hparadiz 3 hours ago |
| You misunderstand. He never would have done it here in the first place. And we would all be poorer for it. Whether he would have been successful elsewhere or not is entirely irrelevant. He could have retired like any one of us normies would have. |
|
| ▲ | ceejayoz 2 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Why did he pick one of the highest tax jurisdictions in the country to do it "in the first place", then? |
| |
| ▲ | hparadiz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Taxes in California are quite low. That's why I moved here and purchased property. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/state-income-tax-ra... > Top marginal rates span from 2.5 percent in Arizona and North Dakota to 13.3 percent in California. (California also imposes a 1.1 percent payroll tax
on wage income, bringing the all-in top rate to 14.4 percent as of 2024.) Am I missing something? | | |
| ▲ | hparadiz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Am I missing something? Yes. Literally an entire lifetime of context. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm not sure any amount of context is going to make your assertions that average Americans can put $140k in savings annually, that the Census doesn't account for pre-tax income, that Musk moved to CA for its low taxes etc. make any sense. | | |
|
|
|
|
