| ▲ | groundzeros2015 5 hours ago | |||||||
Both points support the same conclusion. You can create wealth now without taking it. Glad you agree. > The second point is so ill-formed as to verge on oxymoronic Sounds like name calling. I don’t see a rebuttal. > am not in general a huge fan of, just to be clear, I can respect a person's credentials Are the credentials here a Bachelors from BU? Is this an LLM? | ||||||||
| ▲ | reinitctxoffset 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
If you're not aware, in addition to being generally frowned upon on HN because it's zero-signal snark, the no doubt satisfying BU diss is also such a meme about socially awkward teenagers that it's a bit in a hit movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtMmhcNKn0o. At "Glad you agree" we've left plausible benefit of the doubt that you're arguing in good faith and so I'll bow out with one procedural grade discharge, which is that the LLM accusation is quite trivially prohibited in the stare decis of dang's rulings over the years, but still sometimes rallies downvotes, so my credentials as a human are that no LLM I'm aware of (and I work in AI) has YouTube channels of code streams. Chain of custody on that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48511333 -> https://www.youtube.com/@b7r6-c3t so no, I'm not an LLM. I have Opus read my comments after I post them so I don't persist in trivial errors of reasoning, but I credit LLMs for their output just as I expect mine credited. | ||||||||
| ||||||||