| ▲ | tsimionescu 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No, I'm saying that you can't attribute any significant percent of the value of a Star Wars toy sold today to George Lucas. If Star Wars had not continued after the 1980 films, these toys would not keep selling so much today. The post I replied to allocated all of the monetary value of the Star Wars branding of a toy to George Lucas personally, which I think is obviously wrong. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | groundzeros2015 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hmm, what about JK Rowling and LeBron James where the vast majority of their value is explicitly going to their publisher and they keep only a small percentage. Their tiny portion is a billion after everyone else takes most of it! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||