| ▲ | echoangle 3 hours ago | |||||||
They are mostly planning sun synchronous orbits afaik. That means the orbit is tilted so the earth’s deformed shape continually moves the orbital plane so the satellite is always in the sun (or generally the plane has the same angle to the sun). | ||||||||
| ▲ | XorNot 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Sure: which is a higher and less accessible orbit. The relative fuel cost might be small, but in absolute terms the ship carrying payload is carrying a lot more to do it - see the number of Starships to refuel a Starship in LEO. And here's the thing: all of this is competing with solar+batteries cost on Earth. The power situation is the only advantage here. Like why not put a datacenter on a barge and run an HVDC line out to it far offshore? That would be expensive...but more expensive then space? It's not even outside of the capability set of SpaceX, who already run drone ships to facilitate Falcon 9 landings. | ||||||||
| ||||||||